2008 World’s Most Ethical Companies

A number of companies out there think that a good CSR program consists only of a soapbox and a bullhorn. Unfortunately for them, just being loud doesn’t equate with being ethical. Likewise, simply dropping a cool $100 million into clever marketing and public relations doesn’t make a company ethical, either.
The World’s Most Ethical Companies are the ones that go above and beyond legal minimums, bring about innovative new ideas to expand the public well being, work on reducing their carbon footprint rather than contributing to green washing and won’t be found next to the words “Billion Dollar Fine” in newspaper headlines any time in the near future. These are the companies that stand out among the competition in their industry.
So if that’s what it takes to become one of the World’s Most Ethical Companies, perhaps a good question to ask is, what does it take to be eliminated from consideration for the World’s Most Ethical? The obvious answers involve bribery, discrimination, fraud or any number of other illegal activities. The conditions of supplier factories must be taken into account too, as well as the company’s stance on the environment. Product liability is a factor as well.

Of course, no business is perfect. Every large corporation gets sued or experiences a crisis. The World’s Most Ethical Companies are the businesses that respond not with a PR campaign, but with real action, such as complete transparency for the public and significant effort given to fixing the core problem.
With the help of our methodology panelists, our researchers looked at company history as far back as five years. Products that clearly don’t benefit the public’s best interest pulled down a company’s ranking. Because most large corporations take on lawsuits in five years’ time, we looked at the nature and history of each case and the nature and history of the plaintiff, as well as the effect of the issue in question. We noted if a major case was brought about by a disgruntled ex-employee or generally lacked significant merit.
At the same time, we took note of issues and lawsuits that didn’t hit the largest media outlets. And, because of those little-heard cases, a few of the 2007 winners fell off the list this year. Some fell off because newcomers stood out this year, and others dropped because they got caught up in some unpleasant business since last year’s rankings. You can read more about our methodology below to get a breakdown of how we scored each company.
All of the 2008 World’s Most Ethical Companies are standouts in their industries. These companies up the ante for what it takes to be an ethical leader and force their competitors to follow suit or fall behind.
The World’s Most Ethical Companies use ethical leadership as a purposeful method to drive profits. Finally, each of these companies embodies the true spirit of Ethisphere’s credo: Good. Smart. Business. Profit. We salute them and encourage you to do so as well.

Methodology
01 The Starting Line
We began by bringing together a group of expert attorneys, professors, government officials and organization leaders concerned with ethical and honest business practices to create a methodology panel. The panel assisted us in creating the scoring methodology for the World’s Most Ethical Companies awards.
02 Candidate Selection
Over the course of the year, Ethisphere contacted thousands of companies worldwide about the awards to gather information and create a pool of candidates.
03 Making Contact
Semi-finalist companies were then notified and given an in-depth survey questionnaire to fill out regarding their ethics and compliance program, governance and corporate responsibility. To see a copy of the questionnaire, click here.
04 Crunching Numbers
Ethisphere then conducted data analysis on hundreds of companies based on their responses to the survey, as well as documents and information researched and requested by Ethisphere to confirm survey responses. Every company was then given a score based on the results of the survey and measured against seven distinct categories.
These categories are Corporate Citizenship and responsibility; Corporate governance; Innovation that Contributes to the Public Well Being; Industry leadership; Executive leadership and Tone from the Top; legal, regulatory and reputation Track record; and Internal Systems and Ethics/Compliance Program.
05 The Final Stretch
The highest EQ scores for each industry became finalists and were then notified and interviewed by Ethisphere analysts.
06 And the Winners Are…
Finally, 2008 World’s Most Ethical Companies were announced on June 3rd, 2008 at the Forbes-Ethisphere Ethical Leadership Forum in New York City’s Rainbow Room.
You can find more in-depth information on the methodology for 2008’s World’s Most Ethical Companies at www.ethisphere.com/worlds-most-ethical-companies-methodology.
Ranking
Ethical leadership can and should be profitable. through recognizing companies that pursue an ethical leadership model, the Ethisphere Institute both rewards such behavior and motivates winners and other companies to strive for future recognition.




SPOTLIGHT ON SELECTED WINNERS
What goes on behind the scenes of a company to make it one of the World’s Most Ethical Companies? We spoke with a number of individuals directly responsible for the ethical direction of their company. Following are some excerpts from our conversations:
Mark Burns
Global Compliance & Ethics Coordinator
UPS

Mark Burns, the global compliance & ethics coordinator at UPS, reveals that his company uses ethics as a business strategy. “At UPS, we consider being a good corporate citizen a key ingredient that enables us to be a successful company,” Burns says. “In fact, it is part of our overall corporate strategy.”
With over 100 years of business under its belt, UPS has become the world’s largest package delivery company, operating in more than 200 countries and territories worldwide. Mark points out that UPS is “a global company with many different cultures. Although languages and cultures around the world may be different, we do not change our ethical standards at UPS.” To keep up with the worldwide operations, his ethics program must be ready for international demands. “Our ethics program is global in nature,” he says. “We provide ethics and code of conduct materials in 12 languages, ensuring that our employees understand and adopt ethics policies. Our culture also reinforces written policies. Managers are expected to be role models with their subordinates and their performance and career is judged accordingly.”
Andrew Hinton
Chief Compliance Officer
Google hasn’t even celebrated its 10th birthday yet, and it’s already one of the most influential companies in the technology industry. From the beginning, however, Google has been dedicated to conducting business responsibly and reducing our impact on the environment. The most prominent example is Google.org, the company’s philanthropic arm, which is committed to using the power of information and technology to address some of the world’s most challenging problems: Climate change, poverty, disasters and disease. As of January 2008, the organization had already committed over $75 million in investments and grants around the world.Google encourages its staff to become involved in these efforts at all levels and routinely communicates the importance of ethics and compliance to its employees. Additionally, Google is working with a group of other companies, NGOs and academics to help develop a global code of conduct for how to deal with governments that suppress free expression and privacy. As Andy Hinton, Google’s global ethics & compliance officer, puts it, “World class technology is only the tip of the iceberg at Google. Google wants to change the world for the better in very fundamental ways. That’s part of what makes us a ‘different’ kind of company.”
David Frishkorn
Director of Business Ethics & Compliance
Xerox
Speaking with David Frishkorn, Director of Business Ethics & Compliance at Xerox, reveals a unique approach that Xerox employs in their ethics program. Many companies will place a strong emphasis on tone from the top, and stop there. Frishkorn prefers a different approach. “When everyone focuses on tone from the top, you can have somebody standing there, yelling and shouting, but if they’re not respected, or if the message isn’t properly received, or if the environment is one that is contrary to what the words from the top are, it’s not going to be effective,” says Frishkorn. “The real test of the tone from the top is that it’s received well and that the employees commit to the program.” To that end, Frishkorn says that Xerox helps employees get involved in the ethics program through a basic monthly survey that asks simple questions such as, “Do you think it’s an ethical environment?”, “Do you know about the helpline?” and “Would you call the helpline?” These fundamental questions help the compliance team get an accurate reading of the corporate environment. “There is ample opportunity and space in that survey for people to write in comments, and that’s where we actually get a lot of the ‘good’ data,” Frishkorn says. “So when something monumental happens that is either good or bad from the employees’ perspective, relative to the ethics at Xerox, we can pick up on that pretty quick in the write-in comments.”
David Landau
Chief Compliance Officer
Starbucks
Starbucks isn’t just a household name when it comes to coffee, but it’s also synonymous for outstanding CSR practices. David Landau, the company’s chief compliance officer, notes that Starbucks has a long history of ethical leadership. “Starbucks was founded upon notions that all people should be treated with respect and dignity, that diversity is to be respected and embraced,” explains Landau. He notes that these principles are instilled in employees at every level, from barista to the board. “Even during times of transition, Starbucks partners are focused on doing what’s right by each other, customers, farmers, vendors and shareholders; and we are driven by our mission statement and guiding principles.”Landau points out that a successful ethics program is one that “provides key, clear policies and expectations, and is also flexible enough to move with the business. It adapts to support and promote appropriate decisions and outcomes in an ever-changing and complex business environment.”So, what part of Starbucks’ ethics program is Landau most proud of? The way that it enhances everyday life at the company. “Our program supports and promotes an amazing corporate culture,” he says. “Our business ethics and compliance program is truly global and has helped not only Starbucks partners, but business partners as well, to operationalize the company’s values and guiding principles. We’re proud that partners regularly show their trust by contacting us to share concerns or broach questions.”
Dan Amos
CEO
Aflac

Dan Amos, CEO of Aflac, joined the company in 1973, and during his tenure the company has grown into an international powerhouse in the insurance industry. Amos inherited a company that was founded on ethical principles, like many of the World’s Most Ethical Companies. “This company was founded with the premise that if you take care of your employees, they will take care of the company. This principle has proven true for more than 50 years as Aflac has grown from a small family business to a Fortune 500 company,” says Amos.One of the aspects that helps the company continue to thrive is Amos’ transparent leadership. “As a public company there is a responsibility to tell people what is happening regardless of whether the news is particularly good or bad,” Amos admits. “At Aflac, it is our custom to tell the people what we are doing and why we are doing it to limit any surprises in the future. As a publicly traded company, our actions impact the lives of shareholders and since they own our company, they have a right to know what lies ahead.” This isn’t just rhetoric—Amos can regularly be heard around the office telling employees, “Bad news does not improve with age.”Amos notes that Aflac’s ethics program isn’t just intended for upper levels of management. Rather, an ethical culture is taught from the top down. “Our ethics program is company-wide,” says Amos. “It extends from the call center worker to the IT technician to the board room. You cannot work at Aflac without having taken an online course on ethics and privacy and every employee receives constant reminders of the Aflac way of doing business, which is to treat customers, stakeholders and colleagues with respect and dignity. We are proud that our program impacts all who enter our doors and that it is embraced by our employees.”
Shunichi Nakagawa
Executive Vice President,
Legal and Compliance-Global
Global Corporate Communications
Global Information Systems
Kao

What began as a soap company in the late 19th century, Kao Corporation has since become a leading international manufacturer of cosmetics. Based in Tokyo, Japan, the company has operations in Europe, North America, Asia, the Middle East and Australia.Shunichi Nakagawa, the executive vice president in charge of legal and compliance for Kao, told us that the company was founded with the concept of integrity. “One of our key values written in Kao Way, ‘Integrity’ has been long shared among employees since the foundation of the company, 120 years ago,” Nakagawa told us. “We have Kao’s Business Conduct Guidelines as a code of conduct in our daily activity.” This concept is spread through all employees. “Kao Way and Kao’s Business Conduct Guidelines are introduced and communicated to the employees of the whole group. Programs for ethics and compliance trainings are conducted by various means like internal seminars, intranet, etc. to the employees,” he said.“With this corporate culture, ethics and compliance programs are thoroughly carried out to the employees and each employee fully understands the importance of ‘Integrity.’ This makes Kao stand out among its peers and it is what we are most proud of.”
Thank You
The World’s Most Ethical Companies Methodology Committee is comprised of leading attorneys and government officials, professors and organization leaders who care about ethical and honest business practices.
Ethisphere would like to thank the following individuals for their invaluable assistance in creating the methodology for 2008’s World’s Most Ethical Companies ranking.
| COMMITTEE CHAIR: ALEX BRIGHAM Executive Director The Ethisphere Institute |
DAVID LOGAN Co-founder and Executive Director The Corporate Citizenship Company |
| GEORGE W. ASH Partner Foley & Lardner, LLP |
CHRIS MACDONALD, PHD President Canadian Society for the Study of Practical Ethics |
| STEVE CHURCHWELL Partner DLA Piper US LLP |
TRACI MELVIN Deputy Director Ethics Bethesda, MD |
| CHRIS DERI Head CSR/Sustainability Practice Edelman |
BRIAN MORIARTY Associate Director for Communications Business Roundtable Institute for Corporate Ethics |
| JOHN DIENHART, PHD Director Northwest Ethics Network, Seattle University |
DR. JAMES O’TOOLE Professor Daniels College of Business, University of Denver |
| THOMAS DONALDSON Professor The Wharton School, University of Pennsylvania |
KAREN PAUL Professor Florida International University |
| SEAN GIlBERT Technical Director The Global Reporting Initiative |
RAMA VELAMURI Associate Professor China Europe International Business School |
| JENNY KIM Senior Associate Miller & Chevalier Chartered |
MARTIN WEINSTEIN Partner Willkie Farr & Gallagher |
| BEVERLY KRACHER Professor Creighton University |
ANDREW WEISSMANN Partner Jenner & Block LLP |
| MARC LE MENESTREl Professor of Management and Ethics UPF and INSEAD |
ALEXANDRA WRAGE President TRACE International |
Note: The methodology committee is only involved in reviewing and commenting on WME’s Methodology and is not involved in selecting companies.
Print This Post




June 16th, 2008 at 2:35 pm
If Fresenius Medical Care was voted one of the most ethical, either someone was paid off or they never visited the western business unit. i.e. Kathy Woodruff and Bernard Borkowitz.
June 16th, 2008 at 12:59 pm
Allianz?
I have been informed by UNI Global Union that Allianz
disregards human rights and core labour standards in its
operations in Korea.
Allianz Korea is on strike over 147 days because of the confliction between labor and company about implementation of performance-related pay (changing of pay system) on January 2008. In this chaos, “92 branch managers were fired” and “12 contract employees were dismissed.
June 14th, 2008 at 7:12 pm
As Leona HelmsleyNosbuschHaggermanLayMozilla said:
“Ethics are for little people”
June 14th, 2008 at 2:17 am
I don’t believe most of the companies are truly ethical here, from most of the comments you came to know that people have the differences on each organization, like comment of rena who gave the reasons also and asked, how can then they be ethical?
But considering the territories on they operate or at least when they awarded this for that territory they worked it out better or at least got success in showing so..it is a good practice to compare them, at least they tried to go ethical way…no matter how small that territory is on they operate.
June 13th, 2008 at 2:54 pm
Is it ethical for a company to charge customers for work done by its employees who themeselves are not paid for that time?
Some of these corporations are making hand-over-fist profits and paying their CEOs and the like huge sums of income produced from the backs of underpaid/unpaid employees whose paltry salaries continue to sink further each year due to inflation.
June 13th, 2008 at 11:43 am
I found this out about Gap, how can they then be ethical?
From Co-op America
• Gap brand stores are so popular that a shopping center without a Gap or its subsidiaries, Banana Republic and Old Navy, is a rare sight. While the Gap has made some progress towards becoming a more sustainable company, such as promoting diversity and encouraging community involvement, the company has a long way to go before it can be considered socially responsible.
• In October 2007, Indian authorities raided factories in New Dehli that produce clothing for the Gap and found children as young as 10 working there.
• Another Indian factory that manufactures for the Gap was the site of 3 deaths in 2007 because it refused to allow employees to leave when they became seriously ill at work.
• The Gap was part of a settlement from a lawsuit brought against 22 companies for using sweatshop labor in Saipan, a US territory in the South Pacific. The Gap has also been linked to sweatshops in at least six countries.
• You don’t have to wear clothing that exploits people and the planet. Visit Go Green to find out how you can be stylish and sustainable.
– Profile Updated 06/12/2008
June 12th, 2008 at 10:10 pm
I read this list of companies and I find it interesting. Some I agree with some I don’t. Some I know personally, some I’ve never heard of.
I read the list of responses and I find it freighting just how poor the state of education has become in the U.S.A. (and possibly other countries that maybe represented in these comments).
Ranting is a fundamental right in the U.S.A. but please educate yourselves before doing so. Do some research into these companies and determine how they actually operate, look up the definition of ethics, and learn how ethics apply to business practices before ranting about this list. This will keep you from sticking your foot in your mouth.
For Example:
Selling a product to an End User/Consumer who then decides to misuse or abuse that product is not unethical on the part of the business. It may be a bad decision and/or unethical on the part of the End User/Consumer (i.e. Drinking lots of soda and becoming fatter than a Sperm Whale) but it by no means is the businesses fault. Blaming the business who sold the product for the bad decision and/or unethical behavior of the End User/Customer is like sending the cashier of a local home improvement store to jail because she sold a hammer to someone who used it to kill their neighbor. It is just wrong.
June 12th, 2008 at 9:21 pm
As far as Mcdonalds goes, Yes it is true they support a great deal of charities.
But their advertising and Marketing tactics are nothing short of Brainwashing.
Nutritionwise they are the worst Company on earth besides Burger King !!!
June 12th, 2008 at 7:22 pm
Hello:
Is it possible to see the list online?
I’ve searched for and cannot find a link to the complet list.
Thanks,
Buster
June 12th, 2008 at 12:33 pm
What a bunch of whiners. At least these companies are actually doing something positive with profits and giving back.